<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>邮件安全 on 思安录 | Thinking&#39;s Security Notes</title>
    <link>https://blog.1sec.day/tags/%E9%82%AE%E4%BB%B6%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8/</link>
    <description>Recent content in 邮件安全 on 思安录 | Thinking&#39;s Security Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>zh-cn</language>
    <managingEditor>Thinking</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>Thinking</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.1sec.day/tags/%E9%82%AE%E4%BB%B6%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-51766 SMTP Smuggling：把伪造邮件偷渡过 SPF 与 DMARC</title>
      <link>https://blog.1sec.day/posts/2023-12-15-cve-2023-51766-smtp-smuggling/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Thinking</author>
      <guid>https://blog.1sec.day/posts/2023-12-15-cve-2023-51766-smtp-smuggling/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;出站 SMTP 把 &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;LF&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;CR&amp;gt;&amp;lt;LF&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; 当成普通正文放行，入站 SMTP 却把它当作 DATA 结束符——这一对解释差异让攻击者能把任意 SMTP 命令偷渡进收件方，绕过 SPF/DKIM/DMARC，伪造 gmx.net、web.de、Exchange Online 等域名发信。&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
