<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Email Security on 思安录 | Thinking&#39;s Security Notes</title>
    <link>https://blog.1sec.day/en-gb/tags/email-security/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Email Security on 思安录 | Thinking&#39;s Security Notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-gb</language>
    <managingEditor>Thinking</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>Thinking</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.1sec.day/en-gb/tags/email-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2023-51766 SMTP Smuggling: Sneaking Forged Mail Past SPF and DMARC</title>
      <link>https://blog.1sec.day/en-gb/posts/2023-12-15-cve-2023-51766-smtp-smuggling/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>Thinking</author>
      <guid>https://blog.1sec.day/en-gb/posts/2023-12-15-cve-2023-51766-smtp-smuggling/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The outbound SMTP server treats &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;LF&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;CR&amp;gt;&amp;lt;LF&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; as ordinary body content; the inbound server treats it as the DATA terminator. That interpretation gap lets an attacker smuggle arbitrary SMTP commands past the recipient, bypassing SPF/DKIM/DMARC and forging mail from gmx.net, web.de, Exchange Online and beyond.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
